Science believes in what is true and what is not true on the basis illustrated in the following diagram.

Science has not acknowledged the existence of any physically imperceptible entity known as “God” only because though the astronomers have been able to come up with some such phenomena that can’t be explained without assuming that physically imperceptible things known as “Dark Matter” and “Dark Energy” exist, nobody has been able to come up with same type of phenomena to justify the existence of the entity known as “God”.

Luckily, I have been able to come up with some phenomena of the same type by virtue of having an experience of as long as thirty years in “Management Information Systems”.

THE PHENOMENA DISCOVERED BY ME

Although I have written about such phenomena in the following books, because nowadays as many as 4500 to 10,000 new books get published daily worldwide, with such an influx, many good books go unnoticed.    

(i) “Existence of God” published by Partridge India. It was published by me in the year 2016.   

(ii) “Limitations of the Human Mind: That Restrain Us From Visualizing the Existence of God and Souls” published by Amazon.

(iii) “What May Be Acknowledged as God by Science” published by Amazon last year.

No wonder my books also went unnoticed.

But I am happy to note that Domagoj Kurmaić, the author of a 4-book fantasy series “Zenith of Sorcery” as well as well known for the popular web serial “Mother of Learning” caught sight of my book “Limitations of the Human Mind: That Restrain Us From Visualizing the Existence of God and Souls” and wrote to me what impressed him the most about this book.

Just have a look at what he wrote to me on February 12, 2026, about this book.

Since I felt very happy after reading his letter, I am reproducing it hereunder.

THE LETTER WRITTEN BY DOMAGOJ KURMAIĆ TO ME  

I hope you do not mind me reaching out as a fellow author. My name is Domagoj Kurmaić, and I write fiction, most notably the fantasy series “Mother of Learning”.

I recently read your book “Limitations of the Human Mind: That Restrain Us From Visualizing the Existence of God and Souls”, and I wanted to tell you how much I appreciated its thoughtful and reflective approach. I was particularly struck by the way you connected the limits of human perception to modern scientific concepts such as Dark Matter and Dark Energy. That comparison felt both accessible and quietly persuasive, especially in how it framed invisibility not as absence, but as a consequence of our own constraints.

One part that stayed with me was your discussion of how ignorance does not negate reality, especially the idea that we may be moving through space at immense speeds without any awareness of it. There was something humbling in that reminder. At the same time, I found the later chapters on information systems and the nature of intelligence genuinely thought provoking, though also a little sobering, in the sense that they confront us with how small our cognitive frame may be when set against the complexity of existence.

I would love to hear what originally inspired you to write this book. Was there a particular question, experience, or frustration that pushed you to explore these ideas in this form? As a writer, I am always interested in what first sparks a project, especially one that sits at the intersection of philosophy, science, and belief.

If you feel like sharing more about your journey with this book, or about your thinking as it developed over time, I would be very glad to hear it. Conversations between writers, even across very different genres, are something I value deeply.

Is it not true that even though science has figured out that the Big Bang should have occurred, it has not been able to figure out which entity should have initiated it?

In these books, I have told that much in the same way as our eyes have not been designed to see the infrared waves and ultraviolet waves though such waves exist and, in the same way as even though our ears can’t sense ultrasonic and supersonic sound waves, such waves also exist; our brain has also not been designed to understand things such as “Which entity should have initiated the Big Bang or which entities should have created such modules as have been described by me in these books.

I have told in these books that in the same way as a newborn baby does not know anything whatsoever, even who are its parents; the cells created by the zygote and the cells produced by the cells produced by the zygote and by the cells produced by the cells produced by the cells produced by the cells produced by the cells produced by them further onward are also not supposed to know the following types of things unless some module may be telling them such things.

The types of cells produced by the zygote and by the cells produced by the zygote and by the cells produced by such cells are of two types.

(i) The cells which produce further cells. Let us call them “A” type of cells.

(ii) the cells that become a part of the fetus. Let us call them “B” type of cells.

Such a module must be passing on the following type of information to the “A” type of cells.

– How many cells of which type have to be produced by them?

– How such cells have to be produced?

Likewise, such module must be passing on the information regarding “Where they have to get tugged on to the fetus”, to the “B” type of cells.

Keeping in mind the fact that the finished human fetus consists of as many as 1 to 2 trillion cells ( 1 x 10¹² to 2 x 10¹² cells) of as many as around 200 distinct types, do you think any entity having a brain only as sharp as the human brain could have developed such a module?

Ruled out!

Only some entities having a brain thousands of times more powerful than the human brain could have developed such modules ( one for the males and another for the females).

Which, very clearly, suggests that such entities should have existed on the Earth to have created the human species.

That is about the human species.

What holds good for the human species, also holds good for all species of the mammals that live on the Earth.

What holds good for the mammals, also holds good for all oological creatures and each type of plant and tree that exists on Earth.

If we assume that such module for each mammal, for each oological creature and for each type of plant and tree may have been developed by a different entity, just guess how many such entities should have existed on the Earth.

But don’t you think such entities couldn’t have come into existence on their own?

Some entity should have created them?

I HAVE ASSERTED IN MY BOOKS THAT THERE IS NOTHING WRONG IN CALLING THE CREATOR OF ALL SUCH ENTITIES “GOD”?

But if so, it raises a query: “How the entity defined by me as ‘God’ should have come into existence“?

This query also has the same answer: “It is also one of such things, our brain has not been designed to know.”

JUST BECAUSE WE MAY NEVER BE ABLE TO KNOW THE LANGUAGE IN WHICH SUCH MODULES MAY HAVE BEEN WRITTEN, NOR MAY WE EVER BE ABLE TO KNOW WHERE SUCH MODULES GET INSTALLED, IT WOULD NOT BE SENSIBLE TO THINK THAT THE ENTITIES WHICH SHOULD HAVE DEVELOPED SUCH MODULES MAY NOT HAVE EXISTED OR THE CREATOR OF SUCH ENTITIES SHOULD NOT HAVE EXISTED.

As such, in the same way as infrared waves and ultraviolet waves exist even though our eyes can’t see them and subsonic and supersonic waves also exist even though our ears can’t sense them, we should also agree that the creator of such entities should have also existed and we may call the creator of such entities “God”.

Actually, I have talked about such phenomena even in the following articles, published by me on Medium.com.  

 (i) Some Instances Which Adequately Substantiate ‘Theory of Reincarnation’

(ii)  Why More and More People Are Becoming Atheists

(iii) A Scientific Proof of the Existence of God

(iv) Besides Not Knowing That God and Souls Exist — What Else Do We Not Seem to Know

(v) What May be Acknowledged as God by Science

(vi) Mistake of Interpreting Interaction of Souls as Communication with God

(vii) Ground Work Done by Me to Prove the Existence of Dark Entities

(viii) Things Science Doesn’t Know But May Know Through Deductive Reasoning

(ix) Things That Should Not Be Considered to be Absurd Anymore

(x) The Roles Only Supernatural Entities Could Have Played

(xi) A Sanskrit Word That Solves Several Mysteries

(xii) Types of God Science May Acknowledge

(xiii) What God May Have Done After Creating Quantum Fluctuations.

Though I am very clear in my mind that science will never agree with such concepts of God as are perceived by various religions, I am quite hopeful that it shall acknowledge that such entity as has been perceived by me should have existed at some time or another.

But because “the type of entity thus acknowledged by science” and “the entity treated as God by various religions” are not the same, if science may call such an entity “God“, people are likely to think that science has admitted the entity believed by them as God, as God, although it is not so.

SO TO AVOID SUCH CONFUSION, IT WOULD BE BETTER IF SCIENCE USED SOME OTHER TERM, SUCH AS “SCI-GOD” OR “X-GOD” FOR THE CREATOR OF SUCH ENTITIES INSTEAD OF “GOD“.