Since our eyes can see hardly 0.0035% of the total spectrum of the electromagnetic waves and our ears can sense only about 1% of the entire span of the frequencies of the sound waves, don’t you think, “It is preposterous to think that our brain may not have any limitations”?

It, too, has its own limitations.

The only difference between the limitations of the brain and the limitations of the eyes and the ears is that, though the limitations of our eyes and ears have not undergone any change, it is not so in the case of our brain because of the following reasons.

(i) Our brain keeps on updating us about the things we may not have been aware of in the past.

(ii) There are some such things of which we are not aware, but we may become aware of them with the help of mathematics.

(iii) There are some such things which we neither know nor may ever be able to know.

I am going to give examples of all these reasons one by one in this article. 

An example of something of the first type

Is it not true that though the scientists believed that only physically perceptible things exist in the universe, of late, they have come to know that physically imperceptible things known as Dark Matter and Dark Energy also exist in the universe in such a ratio as has been shown in the following Pie Chart?

An example of something of the second type

Though we are not aware of the fact that we keep on travelling at a speed as high as 1027.7 times the speed of sound in space even when we are asleep, we can calculate the speed at which we keep on travelling in space all the time in such a way as described by me in the article https://medium.com/@subhashchandrasawhney/whether-you-know-or-not-all-of-us-are-travelling-in-space-at-a-speed-as-high-as-1027-7-eccec512eff4 that had been published by me on medium.com October 9, 2023.

Examples of some things of the third type  

If we talk of botany, it has not occurred to any botanist to think, since all plants and trees suck the same ingredients from the soil, how the seeds may be transferring the information related to the type of plant or tree to be grown, to the roots, which, in turn, may be transferring such information to the ingredients sucked by them from the soil.

Nor has it occurred to any botanist to think which entities should have evolved such systems.   

Such systems may have been written only on some invisible medium of the type of Dark Matter.

Nor has it occurred to any botanist, any oologist  or any geneticist to think what sort of entities should have been able to evolve such systems.

Only such entities could have developed such systems that may have had  a brain far superior to the human brain.

Since such systems could have been developed only by such entities which should have had a brain far more efficient than the human brain, nothing is wrong in treating such entities as “Superhuman Entities”.

BUT IS IT NOT TRUE WE NEITHER KNOW NOR MAY EVER BE ABLE TO KNOW FROM WHERE SUCH ENTITIES SHOULD HAVE ARRIVED ON THE EARTH OR WHO SHOULD HAVE CREATED THEM?

In my following book as well as in the article https://medium.com/@subhashchandrasawhney/development-of-botanical-oological-and-genetic-management-information-systems-8cb2f41055d5?sharedUserId=subhashchandrasawhney, published by me on medium.com, I have covered this topic in detail.

What is true about such systems is also true about the theories that explain how the universe should have come into existence.

What is true about such systems is also true about the theories that explain how the universe should have come into existence.

The following theories have been developed so far.

(i) The Big Bang theory.

(ii)  The Theory of Cosmic Inflation.

(iii) The Theory of Black Hole Universe.

(iv) The Theory of Conformal Cyclic Cosmology.

(v) The Theory of Quantum Emergence.

(vi) The Steady State Theory.

According to this theory, the Big Bang is considered a transition event since, before it, the universe was likely in a state of extremely rapid exponential expansion known as cosmic inflation, preceded by an “Ultra-hot, dense quantum realm governed by both quantum mechanics and general relativity”.

DOES THIS THEORY NOT FAIL TO EXPLAIN, HOW “ULTRA-HOT, DENSE QUANTUM REALM” SHOULD HAVE EVOLVED OR WHO SHOULD HAVE CREATED IT, IF WE POSTULATE THAT NOTHING SHOULD HAVE EXISTED ANYWHERE TO BEGIN WITH?

Though all other theories had been advanced as a historical alternative to the Big Bang theory, following the discovery of the “cosmic microwave background radiation“, none of these theories explain, “How ‘cosmic microwave background radiation‘ could have evolved out of nothing?”

Obviously, so many theories have evolved only because our brain has not been designed to let us know “How the universe should have come into existence?”  

Though it gives us a hint that only some such entity as is known as God, which should have known the technique of producing every type of thing from nothing, should have created the universe as had been proposed by the theologians, scientists had turned down this proposal by arguing that this proposal did not make sense because God is a physically imperceptible entity.

But as we know, this argument is no longer valid because we now know that physically imperceptible entities known as “Dark Matter” and “Dark Energy” also exist.

But if we agree that God should have created the universe, is it not true that our brain has not been designed to let us know how such an entity should have come into existence?

DOES IT NOT SATISFY YOU THAT, IN THE SAME WAY AS OUR EYES CAN’T SEE THE ENTIRE SPECTRUM OF ELECTROMAGNETIC WAVES AND OUR EARS CAN’T SENSE INFRASONIC AND ULTRASONIC WAVES, OUR BRAIN ALSO CAN’T LET US KNOW THE FOLLOWING TYPES OF THINGS.

(i) HOW DID THE UNIVERSE COME INTO EXISTENCE?

(ii) HOW TO CREATE ANYTHING FROM NOTHING?

(iii) HOW SUCH SUPERHUMAN ENTITIES AS DESCRIBED BY ME AND THE ENTITY KNOWN AS GOD SHOULD HAVE COME INTO EXISTENCE?